Picture Credit: Denise Krebs || What RFK said is not applicable to investing. Safety First! Don’t lose money!
=======
Investment entities, both people and institutions, often say one thing and mean another with respect to risk. They can keep a straight face with respect to minor market gyrations. But major market changes leading to the possible or actual questioning of whether they will have enough money to meet stated goals is what really matters to them.
There are six factors that go into any true risk analysis (I will handle them in order):
Net Wealth Relative to Liabilities
The larger the surplus of assets over liabilities, the more relaxed and long-term focused an entity can be. For the individual, that attempts to measure the amount needed to meet future obligations where future investment earnings are calculated at a conservative level — my initial rule of thumb is no more than 1% above the 10-year Treasury yield.
That said, for entities with well defined liabilities, like a defined benefit pension plan, a bank, or an insurance company, using 1% above the yield curve should be a maximum for investment earnings, even for existing fixed income assets. Risk premiums will get taken into net wealth as they are earned. They should not be planned as if they are guaranteed to occur.
Time
The longer it is before payments need to be made, the more aggressive the investment posture can be. Now, that can swing two ways — with a larger surplus, or more time before payments need to be made, there is more freedom to tactically overweight or underweight risky assets versus your normal investment posture.
That means that someone like Buffett is almost unconstrained, aside from paying off insurance claims and indebtedness. Not so for most investment entities, which often learn that their estimates of when they need the money are overestimates, and in a crisis, may need liquidity sooner than they ever thought.
No Comments