There’s been no shortage of shrieking from the peanut gallery about the extent to which financial conditions have steadfastly refused to tighten despite multiple Fed hikes and token nods at balance sheet normalization.
Stubbornly loose financial conditions have of course contributed to the continued inflation of bubbles in financial assets and to the draconian suppression of volatility.
Of course low volatility is self-feeding and the behavior it encourages itself encourages still more of the same behavior in a loop that embeds ever more risk into a system that is deceptively stable. In other words, there’s a certain extent to which the low volatility regime is paradoxical, as the longer volatility remains suppressed, the greater is the risk for a violent snapback. If you want to read more on this, we strongly encourage you to check out the following two posts:
Of course if you were looking for equity vol., you won’t find much of it this morning. Indeed, the VIX collapsed to nearly an 8-handle on the heels of earnings beats from multiple market bellwethers.
Read below as Cameron Crise explains why the Fed needs to “throw us a little volatility” before it’s too late…
Via Bloomberg
Hey Fed, Throw Us a Little Volatility Here, Please
Wednesday sees the latest installment of the Fed laying the groundwork for a shift in its balance sheet policy, probably in September. Although the Fed continues to miss its arbitrarily defined inflation target, the Bloomberg financial conditions index is now at easiest level in a decade. That episode ended rather badly, and the Fed would do well to inject a little volatility into proceedings before the market does it for them.
No Comments